A Ponzi Scheme Case with a Better Ending
LexisNexis, April 20, 2011 – – Ponzi scheme cases are now a staple of SEC enforcement. Over the last year or more the Commission has brought dozens of these cases. Most have the same common elements. The promoter has a trading or investment system. The investment is safe potential investors are told. It also has good returns. A good history reassures investors. The returns are spectacular for some schemes while for others they are steady and reliable regardless of the market conditions. Above average returns holds their interest. The investors flock in. Millions of dollars flow to the promoter. In many cases investors are told about their good returns. Some investors are even paid part of the returns. Life is good, particularly for the promoter who is living large with part or all of the investor cash. The end is predictable. The scheme crashes and law enforcement cleans up the scam. By that date of course there is little to nothing left for the investors.
Prior to Madoff SEC and other law enforcement officials use to claim that these schemes were very difficult to detect. Few cases were brought. One of the early actions which now has a better ending for investors than most is SEC v. HKW Trading, LLC, Case No. 8:05-cv-10767 (M.D. Fla. Filed June 9, 2005).
The fraud differs little from most. Howard Waxenberg was alleged to have run a Ponzi scheme through his control of Downing & Associates Technical Analysis, Howard Waxenberg Trading, LLC and HKW Trading LLC. Over a fifteen year period beginning in 1990 Mr. Waxenberg and his controlled entities raised over $70 million from about 200 investors. The scheme Mr. Waxenberg sold investors was “day trading.” This trading technique yielded 20% returns according to Mr. Waxenberg. During its operation investors were sent account statements depicting their returns as promised by Mr. Waxenberg.
As with other similar schemes the account statements were false. The day trading was false. In fact the money was put in low return money market funds – at least in part. Mr. Waxenberg took over significant portions of the money for his personal use according to the complaint.
The Commission’s action started shortly after Mr. Waxenberg committed suicide. At that point the scheme crashed. The SEC filed suit and obtained a freeze order and the appointment of a receiver, Florida attorney Burton W. Wiand. Over the last several years Mr. Wiand and his firm have traced the assets and litigated clawback suits. Now, with recent court approval of the final report prepared by Wiand Guerra King P.L., investors will receive at least part of their money back. That is a far better result than in many similar cases.
To read full article, click here.